- This topic has 170 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 5 years, 2 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
The ones I have available more frequently reported:
Max Printing Resolution
Up to 1200 x 600 dpi
They can be enough? In the event went well, How could I prepare properly file? Drawing lines simply giving for example the size of spaces and lines equal to 0.1mm (for the 5 lp/mm) and mold the life-size file?See here where I try to translate how to teach you to do :
https://stellafane.org/tm/atm/test/tester-2.htmlYou can perform a press-type movies on a computer printer using a transparent film for slides (chioedere the shopkeeper film for slide appropriate for laser printers).
VECCHIIO METHOD (see again just beyond this):
Generally they used between lattices 80 e 150 rows per inch; ma 100 rows oper thumb is a good first choice. Select the image of reticle gif:
https://stellafane.org/tm/atm/test/images/atm_ronchi_screen.gif
(We set Fire Fox 3.6 to scale the page image in the Page Setup 48% to get a pretty 2 x x 2 “Ronchi Grating on our HP LaserJet 2200D)NEW METHOD:
Update added in January 2011: While the image of the previous screen ran on older operating systems and printers, it is now increasingly difficult to use. We recommend that you first try this PDF file:
https://stellafane.org/tm/atm/test/images/atm_ronchi_screen.pdf
Open a PDF viewer such as Adobe Reader or Foxit Reader, use the print preview to make sure you print without magnification or scaling, and should give a good result. The file is set to 200 pixels per inch.Hello everyone
I intervene again in this discussion to tell you that a grid can be printed by using the PrintaRonchi program easily available in the network:
http://www.mirrorgrindingmachine.com/
With it's easy to determine the spacing of the lines and the print size. As written previously I will also assure that the print quality is already more than acceptable with a good quality inkjet not to mention the quality that you get with an ordinary laser.
Hello everybody
Thanks GiM, that's just a small program useful. However I can not get a visible pdf.
Within the software I see the reticle perfectly, when I go to export to pdf when I go to open it I see a black square, no lines, no matter how you magnify, I see always black. I do the same thing if I try to draw them into solidworks. I can not understand what the problem is
There is no need to export the file to PDF. You simply send in print by clicking on the icon on the top left of the screen. If you do not have a printer put the program files to a USB stick and take it behind launching it on a PC with an attached printer.
CiaoI forgot to tell you that when printing is best to set the printer to make them draw lines horizontally rather than vertically. This improves print quality.
Problem solved momentarily, I received this morning the two networks from the USA!
The break is over, he is recovering
Be patient, but with the phone in hand and a steering wheel setup is the maximum I could do… in the meantime I try to optimize everything, you can infer something from this? I think in line with what we had already said, almost spherical center (with a central upward) e 2/5 even more external sottocorretti. I think that will serve even several hours of polishing to get to the ball.
Tester designed and printed with Solidworks 3D printer. I used the magnets in order to change the flight test plate, one made for a Ronchi for Foucault. If you have design tips, improvements or if you notice errors come forward
Everything is in flux and always correctable, From the image, however, and the pattern of circular crown more rounded estrena, I seem to understand that the current figure already very flared outside, It has been produced by in excess races of length and / or lateral swiveling out.
If it is so, to standardize the figure and bring it back to the sphere I would work for a certain time only with the mirror above with 1 / 3D c.o.c.
Beautiful tester…From ignorant 3d Printing, I know that I will have to inform me of that program you mentioned Solidworks, and 3d Printing, having made only a few three-dimensional mechanical design of the rolling heads for steel pipes welded, with autocad but can not remember which version, is the 11 or the next 14 I had purchased in the company over the years 80 and then 90, at the time of their output.
Question: But the hexagonal weave imprinted within projected plastic parts is made whole pe Press?Solidworks is just ideal for mechanical design, prototyping, etc… For example you can design parts simulating an assembly to see how they work together, then save stl in every single part, the amounts in the printer software (in my case Simplify 3d) which processes the printing procedure and controls the machine. Solidworks is very professional and has therefore a lot of useful features.
The hexagonal weave is visible within the pieces because this filament is semi-transparent. It uses the fill honeycomb in order to save material and speed up printing while maintaining an excellent structural level, print pieces so full would be meaningless.
For the mirror I will do as you suggest. Most likely I worked with a pitch not perfectly adapted, I'll try to make a hot-pressed to have a good starting point. You patterns, usali!
With Ronchi you can more easily understand that with Foucault if you're near or far from the ball.
Using the position lattices intrafocale extrafocal or if you have a ball perfectly straight lines appear.
If they are not their distortion will tell you how far you are and what points you have to touch up.
When you've got the ball you can always use Ronchi you closer to the parable. To qualitatively assess the quality of the work done you will be able to refer to the ideal figures given to you by Ronchi program for windows 2.0 downloaded from this same site.
Its use is quite simple.
At that point you should use simultaneously also the method of Foucault that you also provide the numerical values on the quality of the parable
Tonight I opened the tool channels then I dipped in hot water for about ten minutes and, once you softened the right, I put on weight mirror and to take the form as it should. I later polished hour and a half with mirror above and past 1/3 being careful not to overdo it and not to spill over. From Ronchi you would say that is the right direction, the center lines begin to be increasingly straight then continue so until see also align the outer part.
Great! The central zone is spherical.
Continue until you get to extend it to the edge.
Good job
You're almost there, with the tool well adapted as now you will see that the ball comes soon and without changing type of racing, good job !
Ah, if you can try to optimize the contrast / exposure on the image acquisition, try to adjust everything so more “soft”, otherwise you may not be aware of any irregularity ( roughness or small local defects ) , It considers that the edges of the Ronchi lines are never “online” but always “faded”.After two more hours of polishing I think not much has changed
Yet the tool works perfectly, I make the hot pressing before each session, I do the micro channeling surface, the displacement resistance is homogeneous in every direction and I'm maniacally careful not to overflow or exceed with the races. The laser test shows that the surface is not shiny and ok, but I thought I could see, at least, some progress on Ronchi
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.